ARFID 2.0 – Where are we now?
Dr. Tara Tandan, Ms. Celise Dent, and Ms. Carla Willock
Day 1 – 1330 – 1430
Session details: Conference Program

Please rate the presentation:

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Please rate your response to the following statements *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The learning objectives were met by the end of the session.	Strongly AgreeThe learning objectives were met by the end of the session. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe learning objectives were met by the end of the session. Agree	NeutralThe learning objectives were met by the end of the session. Neutral	DisagreeThe learning objectives were met by the end of the session. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe learning objectives were met by the end of the session. Strongly Disagree
Information presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice.	Strongly AgreeInformation presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice. Strongly Agree	AgreeInformation presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice. Agree	NeutralInformation presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice. Neutral	DisagreeInformation presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeInformation presented was practical and relevant to clinical practice. Strongly Disagree
Information was communicated in a manner that kept my interest.	Strongly AgreeInformation was communicated in a manner that kept my interest. Strongly Agree	AgreeInformation was communicated in a manner that kept my interest. Agree	NeutralInformation was communicated in a manner that kept my interest. Neutral	DisagreeInformation was communicated in a manner that kept my interest. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeInformation was communicated in a manner that kept my interest. Strongly Disagree
Presenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions.	Strongly AgreePresenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions. Strongly Agree	AgreePresenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions. Agree	NeutralPresenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions. Neutral	DisagreePresenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions. Disagree	Strongly DisagreePresenter(s) knew the subject matter and could adequately answer questions. Strongly Disagree
The presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants.	Strongly AgreeThe presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants. Strongly Agree	AgreeThe presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants. Agree	NeutralThe presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants. Neutral	DisagreeThe presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants. Disagree	Strongly DisagreeThe presenter(s) created opportunities for interaction and actively engaged participants. Strongly Disagree

The activity complied with the Code of Ethics for parties involved in Continuing Medical Education. *

• Yes
• No

Guidelines for physicians in interactions with industry

Did you perceive any industry bias in the presentation? *

• Yes
• No

If yes, please provide details:

If Ethics in

Can you identify three (3) things you have learned that will change your practice?

Comments about this session.

Submit